Sunday, December 15, 2013

TOW #13: Visual Text- War Propaganda


In the early 20th century, America was soon to begin two world wars that would propel the United States forward into years of supremacy following the wars. However, In order to be successful in both wars and ensure victory, America would need to win through a powerful army. In 1917, this poster was distributed throughout the streets of the nation in attempt to have more men enlist in the military.

Since the context was 1917, World War I was almost over, however since the war ended in 1918, it is evident that this poster could have caught the interest of average Americans who wanted to fight for the nation and fight for a common cause: The United States. With the speaker obviously being the American government, or American military, they are attempting to have more men enlist in the Army as the nation endures a world war, and unknowingly, will enter one in another two decades.

With the picture of Uncle Sam as the character, it connects nationalism as he not only is pictured in the poster, but also he is looking right at the reader with solid eye contact. Notice how the “you” is also capitalized, as if the speaker is focusing on the fact that “you” are the quality individual this Army needs, and they will be ecstatic to have a soldier such as yourself. During times such as this there were members of the army, however in order to win a war it is a national effort, therefore these propaganda posters targeted the average individual who was not completely dedicated to the war effort. Henceforth, the simple diction flat out says, “I want you” in capital letters, which is right to the point and almost a demand, and since these are crucial times for our country it shows that Uncle Sam needs you, but moreover America needs you right now. Finally, the last phrase suggests how and individual can take action and join the military, therefore I believe it achieves its purpose because it suggests why a man should join, and how they can do this. 







Sunday, December 8, 2013

TOW #12: IRB- Eating Animals

Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals, is a detailed investigation about how we “truly” obtain our food that we devour on a daily basis. While his purpose if to inform the public about the “sketchy” procedures of the food industry, and it definitely is under the radar of the public’s knowledge. With his book being the basis of an investigation, the audience is obviously and average American, mostly because in order to inform the public about what our food industries are doing behind our backs, he needs to inform the common man about this issue.

Foer uses a variety of devices in order to make this investigation more appealing to the common man, because for the most part, many Americans with the typical background would much rather read a text with some humor and facts rather than a textbook. Foer accomplishes this with the use of humor. For example, when describing an issue regarding with the chickens we eat, Foer calls this process “bullshit” and even follows it up with the Webster’s definition of Bullshit. Not only does this spice up his text and add some humor, but it allows his to achieve his purpose because it shows how this issue is absolutely ridiculous since we continue to eat, but not even know “exactly” what we are actually eating. 

Foer also uses the device of personal anecdotes to achieve his purpose. With starting the story with a personal anecdote of his personal predicaments regarding food such as him deciding on becoming a vegetarian or not, the audience will now feel that “common experience” since almost every person has that one scenario regarding their food choices as well. This device Foer used was crucial for his text’s success as it was the almost “hook” for him to switch from his personal experiences that would attract the audience, and then guide him to informing them about his purpose. Overall, I think Foer is definitely achieving his purpose so far (I’m only halfway done the book), and I think he orchestrated both an informative, but also interesting book about the food we eat everyday. 




Tuesday, December 3, 2013

TOW #11: Written Text: The Struggles of a Vegan


Mark Bittman, a writer for the New York Times wrote in his text published this past September about what it truly takes to be a Vegan, and titled it “Going Vegan, if Only for a Day”. With the context being within the last two months, the text is applicable to our society as many of our people are changing their lifestyles and diets in order to improve their health as they limit eating meat, or totally avoiding any animal products.

The audience is slightly unofficial as it was released to anybody with access to the website, however it was most likely intended for anybody who has debated on becoming a Vegan; and they would be attracted to this text based off its title. The purpose of the text is to not only inform on what a Vegan is, but to illustrate the difficulties a Vegan faces on a daily basis in order to maintain a diet that does not come in contact with any animal products.

Bittman achieves his purpose through the use of humor, which he exhibits at various times in his text.For example, he states, “I could live off pasta with vegetables for weeks” which is obviously sarcastic, but helps him achieve his purpose of informing his audience that being a vegan limits your options, and that may affect your health worse than just eating these animal products.  Also, Bittman’s title connects to humor, and ultimately his purpose, “Going Vegan, if Only for a Day” because it shows that many decide to join this lifestyle yet do not realize its near-impossible commitment and struggle vegans have finding foods not made form animal products.

I do believe Bittman achieved his purpose of informing the world what it really takes to become a Vegan, and with the use of humor to balance out his commanding tone to bring this ideal to the realities of potential Vegans, I think Bittman successfully informs his readers that this lifestyle is beneficial, yet is no easy task for those enduring the consequences of completely eliminating animal products from their diet.  





http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/18/dining/going-vegan-if-only-for-a-day.html?_r=1&